Priyank Kharge questions the fairness of project distribution while Himanta Biswa Sarma highlights Assam's economic advancements.
In a recent exchange on social media platform X, Priyank Kharge, a prominent figure in Karnataka's political landscape, criticized both Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and Prime Minister Narendra Modi for perceived biases in the allocation of semiconductor projects. Kharge's remarks highlight a growing contention between Karnataka and Assam regarding the benefits of the burgeoning semiconductor industry.
Kharge's post articulated a sense of frustration, questioning why efforts to protect Karnataka’s interests are labeled as “masterstrokes” for Assam and the Prime Minister, while his own actions are deemed “anti-Assam.” He challenged members of the BJP in Karnataka to weigh in on this apparent double standard, inviting insights from BJP leader BY Vijayendra.
The Karnataka minister also urged Sarma to advocate for a more equitable distribution of semiconductor projects among states, proposing a sharing model where Assam, Karnataka, and Gujarat each receive a fair number of projects. He emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in governance, raising several critical questions regarding the status of various state-owned enterprises in Assam, such as the Nagaon Cooperative Sugar Mill and Assam Tea Corporation Limited.
In response, CM Sarma expressed gratitude for the recognition from Karnataka, stating that Assam has made significant strides in its economic development over the past few years. He underscored Assam’s evolving status as a viable location for semiconductor investments, highlighting a shift from its past image associated with militancy to becoming a potential hub for technological advancements.
Sarma's reply not only acknowledged Kharge's concerns but also positioned Assam as a serious contender in the semiconductor race, emphasizing the state's newfound ability to negotiate with major companies. He encouraged Congress leaders to recognize these developments, asserting that Assam is on the brink of a transformative economic phase.
This back-and-forth illustrates the competitive nature of regional politics in India, particularly in the context of emerging industries like semiconductors, which are crucial for economic growth and technological innovation. As both states vie for investment and recognition, the dialogue between their leaders will likely shape the future landscape of India's semiconductor sector.
The exchange between Kharge and Sarma reveals underlying tensions and competitive aspirations between Karnataka and Assam. As both leaders navigate their respective political landscapes, their ability to collaborate and advocate for their states' interests will be crucial in the race to become leaders in the semiconductor industry.