Editor
Chhattisgarh: Union Minister Giriraj Singh has ignited a fresh controversy with his recent remarks regarding Nathuram Godse, the assassin of Mahatma Gandhi. Speaking at a public event in Chhattisgarh, the minister stated, "If Godse is Gandhi's killer, he is also the nation's son. He was born in India, and he was not an invader like Aurangzeb and Babar. Whosoever feels happy to be called the son of Babar, that person can't be the son of Bharat Mata."
The statement made by Giriraj Singh has sparked a heated debate among political leaders and the public alike. Singh's remarks have been met with criticism, with many expressing their disappointment and calling for accountability from a union minister.
Nathuram Godse, a Hindu nationalist, assassinated Mahatma Gandhi on January 30, 1948, in New Delhi. His act of violence was widely condemned, and he was subsequently tried and convicted for the crime. The assassination had a profound impact on the nation and the world, as Gandhi was an iconic figure in the fight for India's independence.
Singh's comparison between Godse and historical figures such as Aurangzeb and Babar has drawn sharp criticism. Aurangzeb and Babar were Mughal emperors who ruled parts of the Indian subcontinent during different periods in history. Their actions and policies have been subjects of historical analysis and debate.
Political leaders from various parties have condemned Giriraj Singh's statement, calling it divisive and against the principles of national unity. The Minister's remarks have also raised concerns about promoting a narrative that may polarize communities and undermine the spirit of inclusivity.
In response to the controversy, Giriraj Singh has not issued a public apology or retraction of his statement.
The incident once again highlights the importance of responsible and inclusive language from public figures, especially those holding positions of power and influence. Political leaders have a responsibility to promote unity and foster an environment of respect and understanding among diverse communities.
As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the government and the concerned political leaders will address the issue and work towards maintaining harmony and upholding the values of India's pluralistic society.